Sign Up for Walters & Shutwell Invites

Three Months of Managed Print Services Survey's: A Summary

From the pages of DOTC...Saturday, August 23, 2008 -

Interesting observations and conclusions.

My weeks have been filled with lots of “windshield time” traveling from client to client surveying output fleets and provide business analysis.
To date, these examinations encompass over 1800 machines and thousands of users.

Without getting into details here are some interesting points derived from looking at ALL the studies as one-

The Numbers:
  • The number of printers to copiers has been 8.2:1. In only one case, the ratio was 3.8:1.
  • In a fleet of nearly 1,000 machines, the average monthly volume is 4,809 images/month/machine.
  • Average Cost Per Copy, using equipment cost only, is 0.021919 for copiers
  • Average Cost Per Copy, when combining copiers with printers is 0.0409
The Purchase or Lease:

  • Most lease terms are 60 months with a sub-majority of leases having “strange” terms; 44 months, 42 months, etc.
  • Lease details are unknown. It is difficult to obtain original leases and often, multiple lease agreements with unique termination dates exist.
  • Although my numbers do not reflect laser printers, as a normal business practice, the laser printer fleet has been purchased and the copiers leased.
Organizational Impact – The copiers are either “invisible” or perceived as a negative influence

  • In nearly every organization, the output devices, to the end user, have become “transparent”. They perform effortlessly and without failure.
  • Common through all organizations is the interest level regarding change – positive interest. Indeed, when interviewed, most users are quite happy with their existing system, yet they express positive feedback when presented with the option of getting new equipment. This is expected; people like “new stuff”. But when delving deeper, the expected level of satisfaction relating to the copier is not high. The “bar” is set low. As an example, end users become familiar with “Broken Again” sign taped to the ADF. Or employees accept the fact that one of their peers is proudly known as the “copier guy” – the one who can always fix jams, avoiding placing a service call with the copier company.
Examples can go on and on – the underlying theme is - People don’t expect much from the copier; they do expect to have jams, the do expect to have challenges with copiers, with printing, with losing output, with having the unit down for days at a time.

Equipment Miss-Match, lease end, invoicing and meter reads

  • There is no surprise that once actual volumes are compared to the recommended volume bands of each machine, clients’ experience shock, awe and then general frustration at having paid for capacity they never utilized.
  • Add to this the ultimate frustration of trying to terminate a lease, even at lease end, and the complete experience is a nightmare.
  • Invoicing, incorrect meter reads, service call management all contribute to a disdain for clients’ current position – all this beyond the costs.
Please note, that these are my personal observations on a small pool of studies. My opinions are based on my interpretation of the data and interviews.

Also, HP studies revealed years ago what I am finding today – for every copier, there are 8 printing devices and average monthly output per device is less than 10,000 images.

No surprises for me, plenty for the client – and now we get to see how responsive to change some will be – stay tuned.

=======

The above was published over four years ago - there are some differences between then and now.

Are you building an MpS practice and stymied by the challenges of the day?

Would you like to improve your chances of sustaining your practice?

Join us.

Reactions:

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Jen's Twitter

Greg's Twitter...

Standard Disclaimer

Unless otherwise specified, the views expressed on this web site are our own, and not those of any current or past employer, clients of current or past employers or any other individual or individuals connected with Walters & Shutwell, TheDeathOfTheCopier Project, GalacticRailWorks or the Internet at large.

Nothing included or said on this web site is meant to offend anyone in any way. If this ever happens to be the case, we wish to apologise for the incident.

Any information relating to persons, dates and places, unless otherwise specified, should be taken only as a guideline and not considered as legal information. It is recommended that all such information relating to persons, dates and places be checked through an independent authority to verify for legality and correctness.

Anything expressed on this site is not legal advice. This is not legal advice.

Anything expressed on this site is not investment advice.

All names, logos, and other outside material, including material submitted by 'contributors', or attributed to other sources, remains the property of their respective copyright owners.

All web design in these pages remains the property of the person who created and maintains the design, and is copyrighted under his or her ownership and name. HTML formatting on this site, where not specifically attributed to another person, remains copyright under my sole responsibility and ownership.

Any use of selected HTML tags in conjunction with each other to create an atmosphere similar to that of this web site, will be considered a legal violation of copyright laws.


Copyright (C) 2007-2012 All Rights Reserved